residential areas

there has been a lot of complaints 
in media and even on youtube channels 
mainly in the western world like usa and eu 
about residential areas with private houses in suburbs 

my conclusion is that those complaints 
are because unrighteous humans controls 
individuals in media and youtube channels 

and I don't agree with those complaints 

residential areas is less area efficient than apartment buildings 
but there is a lot of land in usa and eu 
where more residential areas can be built 

if residential areas are built on farmland 
then that's no problem 
because there is a lot of unused land in usa and eu 
that can be used as farm land 

those living in residential areas 
become dependent on owning their own cars 
to travel to and from residential area 
but then the government don't need to spend money 
to build public transport 
and cars being sold feeds the economic engine of the country 
and the government will build roads anyways 
whether to a residential area or to a city 

residential areas could evolve into small cities 
and later bigger cities 
and that organic growth of the economy 
develops the economic engine of the country 

in the future autonomous cars and flying cars 
will connect residential areas more with cities and industrial areas 

there are many poor countries with lots of land 
and many countries with lots of poor people and lots of land 
like brazil, africa, india, russia, and china 

those countries could feed their economic engines 
by allowing companies to build a lot more residential areas 
so that those with money could buy houses in residential areas 

the construction of residential areas will give poor people jobs 
so that poor people can afford to move to apartment buildings 
which will develop the economic engine of those countries 

the governments of poor countries often have tyrannical tendencies 
which prevents the economies from developing 
which is why tyrannical countries remain poor 

and when democratic countries in north america and europe 
become more tyrannical 
then their economies are prevented from developing 
which is why the economies are stagnating in north america and europe 
and weaker economy means less resources to the military 
which is a national security problem 
so tyranny and tyrannical tendencies is a threat to national security 

but if a country allows companies to build houses in residential areas 
so that people with money can buy houses in residential areas 
and those residential areas develop into smaller cities 
and later later bigger cities 
and that organic growth of the economy 
develops the economic engine of that country 
so that the country will have more resources for it's military 

tyranny is not a strong leader doing what the population want 
whether he is democratically elected or not 

tyranny is when individuals abuse the population 
to weaken the population 
so that the tyrants strengthen themselves 
which is why the real tyrants are always unrighteous 

unrighteous humans tries to control official leaders 
so that it seems like the official leaders are the tyrants 
when it's the unrighteous humans that control the official leaders 
to abuse the population 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

live❤️

quiet, stealthy and fast aircraft

humanoid robots