logic

I think that around 123 yeara ago 

unrighteous humans were genetically engineered 

to give birth to unrighteous humans 

that looked better 

and became more competent to be used at work 

and became more competent to be used in wars 

and became more competent to function in society 

unfourtunately that also made it more difficult to see which humans 

are unrighteous 

unrighteous humans that were genetically engineered to look better and become more competent 

have used those better looks as camouflage to abuse others 

and that increased competence to abuse others 

that genetic engineering didn't change the core 

of those unrighteous humans so they didn't become righteous 

but it probably increased their survivability 

and even if not many unrighteous humans were genetically engineered 

they probably reproduced more 

and that could explain why unrighteous humans continued to abuse others for so long time 

I think that was a mistake 

if unrighteous humans would have looked the same like before 

and were incompetent like before 

then that could have created conflicts in countries 

but those conflicts would also have solved problems 

I understand the economic arguments 

but that was shortsighted 

better to use genetic engineering and cybernetic engineering 

to enhance righteous humans 

that will give long term economic benefits 

genetic engineering should not go against evolution 

genetic engineering should go with evolution 

and nature should be allowed to do it's thing